A group of conservative lawmakers and religious leaders has submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. Supreme Court, citing nearly a dozen Bible passages in support of a Tennessee law banning gender-affirming health care for minors. The brief is part of a larger legal case that could have significant implications for the transgender community across the United States.
The Case at Hand: Tennessee’s Gender-Affirming Care Ban
The Supreme Court is set to decide whether Tennessee’s 2023 law, which bans gender-affirming treatments for minors, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for future legislation concerning transgender rights and health care nationwide.
The brief, filed on Wednesday, includes arguments from current and former members of 23 state legislatures, along with the American Family Association, a Christian organization known for its opposition to abortion and LGBTQ+ rights.
Religious Influence in Legal Arguments
Typically, amicus briefs presented to the Supreme Court focus on legal precedents, statutes, and scholarly research. However, this brief makes an unusual move by referencing 11 passages from the Bible under the section titled “Other Authorities.” The brief does not specify which Bible version is being referenced.
The selected passages emphasize the importance of acknowledging God’s authority. The group argues that the nation’s founders encouraged Americans to follow biblical teachings and that, with divine guidance, individuals can grow in faith and self-discipline.
According to the brief, these views align with “our country’s history and tradition,” suggesting that the law should reflect biblical principles.
Tennessee’s Law and Its Legal Implications
Tennessee’s law prohibits minors from receiving medical treatments that help them transition to a gender identity different from their biological sex. These treatments are described in the law as promoting “identity politics,” which the brief argues is “fundamentally at odds with the original meaning of the Constitution and the biblical and classical tradition that influenced the Founders.”
The U.S. Department of Justice is challenging the law, claiming that it violates constitutional protections against discrimination. The case is seen as a critical test of how the Court will interpret the intersection of religious views, constitutional rights, and gender-affirming care.
A Broader Debate on Church and State
This case also highlights a growing debate within the conservative legal movement regarding the role of religion in government. The filing reflects ongoing arguments that there is no constitutional requirement for a strict separation of church and state in the United States.
As the Supreme Court prepares to hear this case, its ruling could have lasting effects on both the legal landscape for gender-affirming care and the relationship between religion and law in the country.
Related topics:
- 28 Bible Verses on Deliverance from Captivity
- 30 Scriptures on Breaking Evil Patterns
- 25 Bible Verses on Creation and Nature