The Christian Standard Bible (CSB) has gained popularity among believers for its commitment to accuracy and readability. However, like many translations, it has faced scrutiny regarding its treatment of certain verses. Some critics have raised concerns about verses seemingly missing in the CSB compared to other translations. This article aims to address these concerns and provide clarity on whether the CSB leaves out verses.
Understanding Translation Principles
Before delving into specific verses, it’s essential to understand the principles guiding Bible translation. Translating ancient texts, especially the Bible, involves navigating linguistic nuances, cultural contexts, and textual variants. Translators must balance fidelity to the original manuscripts with readability in the target language.
1. Source Texts: Translators typically work from original language manuscripts such as Hebrew and Greek. These manuscripts may have textual variations due to copying errors or differences in manuscript traditions.
2. Textual Criticism: Scholars use textual criticism to determine the most likely original reading of a text when discrepancies arise among manuscripts. This involves comparing different manuscripts and applying criteria to ascertain the authentic wording.
3. Translational Philosophy: Translators adopt different philosophies, ranging from formal equivalence (literal translation) to dynamic equivalence (thought-for-thought translation). The chosen philosophy impacts how closely a translation adheres to the original wording.
With these principles in mind, let’s examine specific instances where critics allege that the CSB omits verses.
Verses Allegedly Missing in the CSB
Matthew 17:21
- Some translations, such as the King James Version (KJV), include Matthew 17:21, which reads, “Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting.” However, the CSB and other modern translations omit this verse.
- Explanation: Textual scholars have noted that Matthew 17:21 is not present in some of the earliest Greek manuscripts. It is likely a later addition, possibly borrowed from a parallel passage in Mark 9:29. The CSB follows the textual evidence and excludes this verse.
Matthew 18:11
- Similarly, the KJV includes Matthew 18:11, “For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost,” whereas the CSB and other modern translations omit it.
- Explanation: Matthew 18:11 is absent from many early manuscripts and is likely a scribal addition from Luke 19:10. Scholars believe it was inserted to harmonize Matthew with Luke. The CSB reflects the omission based on textual evidence.
Mark 7:16; Mark 9:44, 46
- The CSB omits Mark 7:16, which is present in the KJV and other translations, stating, “If any man have ears to hear, let him hear.” Additionally, it excludes Mark 9:44 and Mark 9:46, both containing phrases about eternal punishment.
- Explanation: These verses are absent from significant early manuscripts of Mark. Textual critics consider them later additions influenced by parallel passages or liturgical usage. The CSB aligns with the earliest and most reliable manuscripts in excluding these verses.
John 5:4
- Some translations, including the KJV, include John 5:4, describing an angel stirring the waters at the Pool of Bethesda. However, the CSB and other modern translations omit this verse.
- Explanation: John 5:4 is absent from the earliest and most reliable manuscripts of John. It likely originated as a marginal gloss or explanatory note and was later incorporated into the text. The CSB reflects the omission based on textual evidence.
Conclusion
The CSB’s approach to verse inclusion aligns with scholarly consensus and textual evidence. While some verses may differ from older translations like the KJV, these differences reflect the pursuit of accuracy and faithfulness to the original manuscripts. Christians can use the CSB with confidence, knowing that it provides a reliable and accessible representation of God’s Word.
FAQs:
What churches use CSB?
Many churches across various denominations use the Christian Standard Bible (CSB). It is particularly popular among evangelical and conservative Protestant churches in the United States. However, its usage extends globally, with churches in different countries adopting it for preaching, teaching, and personal study.
Is CSB a word-for-word translation?
The CSB is not a strictly word-for-word translation but rather employs a balance between formal equivalence (word-for-word) and dynamic equivalence (thought-for-thought). It aims to faithfully represent the meaning of the original texts while ensuring readability in modern English. As such, it prioritizes accuracy while also considering readability and clarity for contemporary readers.